Stimulus

But if you really take the ideas seriously, yeah I do think you can’t be meaningfully left wing in any sense that matters and also believe that certain people have irreducible magic connections to the soil by virtue of ancestry alone. There is no version of that that ends well.
opinionhaver.bsky.social · source

Response

Every mysticism of blood and soil begins as poetry and ends as law. The move from 'we belong here' to 'they do not' is so short it barely counts as a step.

nature knew no right divine in men, / No ill could fear in God; and understood / A sov'reign being, but a sov'reign good. / Who first taught souls enslav'd, and realms undone, / Th' enormous faith of many made for one — Pope

To virtue, in the paths of pleasure trod, And own’d a father when he own’d a God. Love all the faith, and all th’ allegiance then; For nature knew no right divine in men, No ill could fear in God; and understood A sov’reign being, but a sov’reign good. True faith, true policy, united ran, That was but love of God, and this of man. Who first taught souls enslav’d, and realms undone, Th’ enormous faith of many made for one; That proud exception to all nature’s laws, T’invert the world, and counter-work its cause? Force first made conquest, and that conquest, law; ‘Till superstition taught the tyrant awe, Then shar’d the tyranny, then lent it aid, And gods of conqu’rors, slaves of subjects made: She, ‘midst the lightning’s blaze, and thunder’s sound, When rock’d the mountains, and when groan’d the ground, She taught the weak to bend, the proud to pray, To pow’r unseen, and mightier far than they: She, from the rending earth, and bursting skies, Saw gods descend, and fiends infernal rise: Here fix’d the dreadful, there the blest abodes; Fear made her devils, and weak hope her gods; Gods partial, changeful, passionate, unjust, Whose attributes were rage, revenge, or lust;
Alexander Pope, “An Essay on Man. Epistle III — Of the Nature and State of Man with Respect to Society”

Pipeline

Triage
The post is arguing about the incoherence of holding two opposed political beliefs simultaneously — and the canon has abundant work on self-deception, the stories power tells itself, and the collision between stated principle and actual conduct.
The problem
The tension between egalitarian rhetoric and the human appetite for justifying inequality through nature, ancestry, and irreducible difference — the way political doctrines can paper over material contradictions without the believer seeing the gap.
Search queries
ideology concealing appetite for power and hierarchy, the belief systems that justify domination through nature and blood, contradiction between stated principle and inherited privilege
Composition mode
thought_quote
Chunk ID
alexander-pope-homer-the-iliad-extr-an-essay-on-man-epis-008-dup2
Source
bluesky_timeline