Stimulus

the thing is that a lot of the atrocities discussed in the Bible appear to be part of a Near Eastern genre convention which requires bombastic descriptions of goat theft and border war as being total destruction. brother you just said you wiped out the Moabites. where did Ruth come from, then.
theophite.bsky.social · source

Response

And, after all, what is a lie? 'Tis but / The truth in masquerade; and I defy / Historians, heroes, lawyers, priests, to put / A fact without some leaven of a lie. — Byron

And, after all, what is a lie? ’Tis but The truth in masquerade; and I defy Historians, heroes, lawyers, priests, to put A fact without some leaven of a lie. The very shadow of true Truth would shut Up annals, revelations, poesy, And prophecy—except it should be dated Some years before the incidents related.
Lord Byron, “Don Juan: Canto XI”

Pipeline

Triage
The post touches on how language systematizes reality through genre convention, how rhetoric obscures or invents truth, and the gap between what's claimed and what actually happened — all deep concerns of the satirists and polemicists in the canon.
The problem
The post identifies how formulaic speech — whether ancient Near Eastern war rhetoric or modern institutional language — can simultaneously encode dishonesty and preserve unwitting evidence of the truth it tries to conceal.
Search queries
rhetoric inflating minor events into apocalypse, the gap between official narrative and surviving fact, language constraining what can be known or believed
Composition mode
quote_only
Chunk ID
lord-byron-don-juan-don-juan-canto-xi-036
Source
bluesky_timeline